next up previous
Up: Propagation of a K-body Previous: GOE correlations in the

3.9

Proof of equation ()

 

In eq. (3.8), consider the special case of tex2html_wrap_inline3732:
 equation1606
Let tex2html_wrap_inline3734 be
 equation1617
and f a function that is completely symmetric in the arguments tex2html_wrap_inline3738. The restricted sum of eq. (B1) can be written as the unrestricted sum
 equation1625
The matrix elements vanish unless the tex2html_wrap_inline3740 all appear in tex2html_wrap_inline3738. Consider a term that satisfies this condition. There are tex2html_wrap_inline3744 ways in which the indices r that agree with one of tex2html_wrap_inline3740 can be distributed over the postions tex2html_wrap_inline3750. Therefore, imposing the requirement that the first tex2html_wrap_inline3752 indices tex2html_wrap_inline3754 should agree with tex2html_wrap_inline3740 (up to a permutation) one obtains


 eqnarray1650
Here, the restriction tex2html_wrap_inline3758 means that none of the indices tex2html_wrap_inline3760 ,tex2html_wrap_inline3762, is allowed to coincide with any one of the indices tex2html_wrap_inline3764, tex2html_wrap_inline3766. The short hand notation tex2html_wrap_inline3768 means the same. Eq. (B4) is obviously the same as
 equation1694
which is easily generalized to eq. (3.9).



  table1827
Table i: Two-body interaction in the exciton picture.

 table1942
Table i: (Continued) Two-body interaction in the exciton picture.