next up previous
Next: Acknowledgements Up: Results Previous: Spreading width in A-body

Discussion

Within the framework of the statistical model the spreading width due to an arbitrary K-body force has been calculated for a compound nuclear reaction of an A-body nucleus. The spreading width is the adequate measure for symmetry nonconservation in complex many-body systems [2, 28]. It measures the extent to which the states are smeared out due to the presence of the symmetry breaking force. It also appears as the damping width of a simple configuration -- such as an isobaric analog state or a giant resonance -- into the complex compound nuclear configurations. Definite numbers for a particular interaction can be given if eq. (4.6) is complemented by the calculation of the spectral average of the interaction in K-body space. Obvious applications are the electromagnetic and weak forces, responsible for the breaking of isospin and parity, respectively. Numerical studies in that direction are currently under progress. For the case of isospin breaking a weak dependence of the spreading width on energy and mass number is known [2]. In the present study the energy or temperature dependence has been related to the body rank of the underlying interaction. The variation of tex2html_wrap_inline3140 with temperature can be compared with the results of other authors. Assuming that the spread of a one-exciton configuration (a 1p 0h state) is proportional to the square of the excitation energy [29, 30], Lauritzen et al. [31] have concluded a tex2html_wrap_inline3604-dependence for the spreading width in general. Since the decay of the one-exciton configuration is caused by tex2html_wrap_inline3630, we indeed find from eq. (4.4) its damping to be proportional to tex2html_wrap_inline3632 and eq. (4.7) indeed indicates a tex2html_wrap_inline3604-dependence of the spreading width in A-body space (for transitions caused by the strong interaction only). Studying the coupling of surface modes to single particle motion, Esbensen and Bertsch [32] found the ``elementary damping'' to be proportional to E, which in the framework of Lauritzen et al. corresponds to a tex2html_wrap_inline3640-dependence of the spreading width. There is nothing analogous in the present results since we did not consider collective motion in the present paper. De Blasio et al. [33] report the damping of giant resonances to be independent of the nuclear temperature. Again the reason is that the statistical damping of the present study is different from the damping mechanism considered there. This is also true for the study of spreading properties of isobaric analogue and Gamov-Teller resonances by Colò et al. [34]. This paper indicates, however, that the statistical damping must be taken into account in order to explain the widths of the resonances.

Frequently the treatment of parity violation in CN reactions is restricted to the k=1 part of the weak interaction [35, 36, 37, 38, 39]. Eq. (4.8) indicates, however, that the contribution of the operators with exciton rank two should be included in the calculation of a local mean square matrix element.

The average tex2html_wrap_inline3114 in K-body space is by definition taken over the bound K-body states only. This is not a complete system of states. The result may therefore depend on the mean field that generates the one-body states from which the K-body states are built up. Consider for instance K=2 and an interaction which is proportional to a delta function and independent of A. Nevertheless the two-body matrix elements of this interaction decrease with increasing volume of the system, i.e. with increasing A. We may therefore not rule out a variation of tex2html_wrap_inline3114 with mass number. Consequently, eqs. (4.6) and (4.7) might not exhibit the complete A-dependence of the spreading width, which is expected to be weak.

Finally we point out the limitations of our method. The Hartree Fock method and the particle hole formalism rely on a basis of product states. Such an independent particle model cannot describe collective phenomena in nuclei. The present results therefore must be modified if applied to reactions that involve collective excitations. A second problem are the effects of the symmetries respected by the interaction under study. These effects will of course manifest themselves automatically when the spectral average in the K-body space is calculated. The use of partial level densities for the actors that contain all states at a given energy irrespective of further quantum numbers, however, neglects possible local effects of the respected symmetries. We give an example to illustrate this complication. Consider the weak potential (k=1) in a nucleus. This operator connects many-body states that differ by only one single-body configuration. Parity violation and conservation of total angular momentum demand that the single-body states differ in l but not in j. Since single-body states with tex2html_wrap_inline3670 and tex2html_wrap_inline3672 only exist in different shells, they are separated by a relatively large energy interval. Consequently, the present local average suppresses these contributions to the spreading width. The two-exciton part of the weak interaction on the other hand is not subject to this ``local selection rule'' because it simultaneously changes two single-exciton configurations. This fact was first pointed out by Lewenkopf and Weidenmüller [40]. They estimated that the k=2 part of the weak interaction dominates the local mean square matrix element. In section ivB it was found that potential and scattering contribute about equally to the spreading width without taking the local effects of the symmetries into account. Sufficiently elaborate expressions for the single-exciton level densities of the actors before and after the interaction would only overlap in a small energy range, and consequently the convolution of tex2html_wrap_inline3676 with tex2html_wrap_inline3678 would result in a smaller contribution of the potential to the strength.


next up previous
Next: Acknowledgements Up: Results Previous: Spreading width in A-body